From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Crash on empty HOME var in Windows registry Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:23:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4676F7D7.7020509@gmail.com> References: <46764C61.1050804@free.fr> <4676A28C.7090605@gnu.org> <4676F372.1020503@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182201831 5728 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2007 21:23:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Vincent Liard To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 18 23:23:49 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I0OhP-0005lu-UJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:23:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0OhP-0008JA-3d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:23:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I0OhL-0008CJ-UX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:23:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I0OhK-00087E-Cw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:23:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0OhK-00086x-4B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:23:42 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I0OhI-0008Dk-TI; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:23:41 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-133-189.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.133.189]:62913 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1I0OhG-00074o-4v; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:23:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070604 Thunderbird/2.0.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <4676F372.1020503@gnu.org> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000750-1, 2007-06-18), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.133.189 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1I0OhG-00074o-4v. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1I0OhG-00074o-4v 0ea0bc7b4cc89f5d03baf6bd6ad387df X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:15945 Archived-At: Jason Rumney wrote: > Juanma Barranquero wrote: >> Well, I don't want to "support" them, more like ignore them (that's >> what the patch does). Do you think it's better to abort Emacs? > > Most users would never figure out why emacs is aborting, so it is better > to ignore them. Why?