From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Moynihan Subject: Re: an annoying indentation Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:43:18 +0100 Message-ID: <46716216.8010701@calicojack.co.uk> References: <466ED55E.1070804@calicojack.co.uk> <3a39e8471057cbbd01a7dca42cdc3d39@science.uva.nl> <20070614105700.46b2b82d@CNDLS-3T02621> <28563.1181833352@lap1.smtl.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HyrUR-0000PR-89 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:44:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HyrUP-0000P8-ES for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:44:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HyrUP-0000P3-AJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:44:01 -0400 Received: from storm.bpweb.net ([83.223.106.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HyrUO-00048n-Tf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:44:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <28563.1181833352@lap1.smtl.co.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: pete phillips Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org pete phillips wrote: >>>>>> "John" == John Rakestraw writes: > John> In response to which, Leo wrote: > > >> I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user > >> want to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used. > >> > > John> I agree with Leo -- or, rather, his proposal matches more nicely the > John> way I work. I often have lists with some items annotated and > John> others not annotated -- > > I agree with John and Leo. > > Pete > Given that my initial suggestion of multiple TAB presses goes against the Emacs grain, I'm also in favour of John of Leo as my lists aren't structured in a way consistent with Carsten's proposal. R.