From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should nXML be included Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:20:13 +0100 Message-ID: <466EAB9D.9020408@gnu.org> References: <466E7A93.3050705@gmail.com> <466E81AA.3030202@gnu.org> <466E9822.2050508@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181658032 16535 80.91.229.12 (12 Jun 2007 14:20:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Leo , "Eric M. Ludlam" To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 12 16:20:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hy7ER-0004g2-D3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:20:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hy7EQ-0003Ao-KG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:20:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hy7EN-00039s-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:20:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hy7EK-00039K-E7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:20:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hy7EK-00039H-9n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:20:20 -0400 Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hy7EJ-00027q-L7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:20:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A063B5301E; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:20:17 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) In-Reply-To: <466E9822.2050508@gmail.com> X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72694 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > Validation of course loose most of its meanings, but not all. > Completion can still be used. The completion in nxml-mode is only as good as it is because the validation tells it what is valid in that context. You can't have one without the other. Like I said, as soon as you start trying to make nxml a general SGML mode, you introduce compromises. Multiple major mode support is a separate issue from nxml, and something that should be addressed without imposing restrictions on specialized major modes.