From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Checkout the sources for the release branch Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:15:32 +0100 Message-ID: <46558FF4.2000501@gnu.org> References: <4654BBC8.7010201@gmail.com> <4654C5AA.9000204@gmail.com> <4654CC27.3000908@gmail.com> <87odkbunni.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4654CF9B.40309@gmail.com> <4654D337.8070602@gnu.org> <4654D44C.2000303@gmail.com> <4654D643.70107@gnu.org> <4654D8EC.5080802@gmail.com> <86odkabtlb.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <465563EB.9070400@gmail.com> <46556937.7080701@gnu.org> <46556A66.6020901@gmail.com> <465573FB.3010406@gmail.com> <465576A3.40305@gnu.org> <4655791E.9090502@gmail.com> <46557EB6.1000408@gnu.org> <86zm3u8ltu.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86veei8kuu.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180012625 8709 80.91.229.12 (24 May 2007 13:17:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ralf Angeli , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 24 15:17:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HrDBZ-00049q-5g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:16:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HrDBb-0005ED-8g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 09:16:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HrDAP-0004TP-SF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 09:15:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HrDAO-0004SX-F1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 09:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HrDAN-0004SD-H5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 09:15:43 -0400 Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HrDAL-00064l-V6; Thu, 24 May 2007 09:15:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C6850DC4; Thu, 24 May 2007 14:15:40 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) In-Reply-To: <86veei8kuu.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71747 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > The idea was to have people testing Windows binaries built by the same > process and on the same computer that will get used for the final > release. It would be embarrassing, for example, if we figured out > after the final release of the binaries that _this_ machine had no or > insecure image libraries. > The image libraries are irrelevant, as we won't be redistributing them ourselves. While I agree in principle with what you are saying, I have only just started looking at changing the packaging scripts to take into account the extra functionality we are putting into this release - the lisp reference, leim as an integral part of Emacs rather than a separate package, emacsclient, etc - so I cannot upload anything at the moment.