From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Checkout the sources for the release branch Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:24:44 +0200 Message-ID: <465575FC.3050500@gmail.com> References: <4654BBC8.7010201@gmail.com> <4654C2CF.1060402@gnu.org> <4654C5AA.9000204@gmail.com> <4654CC27.3000908@gmail.com> <87odkbunni.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4654CF9B.40309@gmail.com> <4654D337.8070602@gnu.org> <4654D44C.2000303@gmail.com> <4654D643.70107@gnu.org> <4654D8EC.5080802@gmail.com> <86odkabtlb.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <465563EB.9070400@gmail.com> <86y7jea5oe.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <46556A0B.3060706@gmail.com> <86hcq2a45q.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180005899 14287 80.91.229.12 (24 May 2007 11:24:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 24 13:24:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HrBR5-0005MY-Jv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:24:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HrBR7-0000Dg-Tv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 07:24:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HrBR3-0000DR-Fg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 07:24:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HrBR1-0000DF-3H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 07:24:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HrBR0-0000DC-UO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 07:24:46 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HrBQz-00072u-TH; Thu, 24 May 2007 07:24:46 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:62469 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1HrBQy-00035J-3w; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:24:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070326 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <86hcq2a45q.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000743-1, 2007-05-24), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HrBQy-00035J-3w. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1HrBQy-00035J-3w 98808f90574a5a1c2f3ce2c9a7af17cd X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71730 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > That's hardly a problem with Emacs or its web pages. If you have no > clue whatsoever about the tools you are using and expect to magically > have them switch branches, there is no amount of handholding that > could reliably keep you from shooting yourself in your foot. > > It is not like the existence of EMACS_22_BASE as a _separate_ branch > from the trunk has been kept a secret on the list. > >> - If I complain about something I am not doing that because I just >> want to complain. I did find the current situation less useful. > > I don't see any remedy that would address your problem, namely that > you don't understand what you are doing and can't be bothered to read > up on it. > > The discussion about the release branch has been going on for months > now. What do you think people are talking about? Maybe you are right, but I think we would move forward better if you tried to see things from my point of view.