From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?S8Ohcm9seSBMxZFyZW50ZXk=?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: multi-tty branch created Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:11:09 +0200 Message-ID: <464B2D1D.1080003@lorentey.hu> References: <87sla0rgs4.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <85abw8pyk7.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85646wpuqn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <86sl9wpytm.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0023630444==" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179331892 22037 80.91.229.12 (16 May 2007 16:11:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 16 18:11:30 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HoM65-00035H-Bf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 18:11:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HoME4-00018q-V1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 12:19:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HoME0-00018S-Ef for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 12:19:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HoMDw-000186-Ov for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 12:19:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HoMDw-000183-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 12:19:36 -0400 Original-Received: from ninsei.hu ([212.92.23.158]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HoM5u-0001jF-16; Wed, 16 May 2007 12:11:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.36.9] (ns.netvisor.hu [195.228.79.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chatsubo.ninsei.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA1B783B; Wed, 16 May 2007 18:11:16 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) Original-Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel In-Reply-To: <86sl9wpytm.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71181 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============0023630444== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8D896C30CDAC9829A809FCCC" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8D896C30CDAC9829A809FCCC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David Kastrup wrote: > K=C3=A1roly L=C5=91rentey writes: >> I don't believe it represents a regression in its current form. As >> we know, Windows support is broken, but thankfully people are >> working on that now. >=20 > Uh what? In its current form, Windows support is broken but it does > not represent a regression? We must have different definitions of > "regression" then. Clearly, I meant that it does not represent a regression for UN*X users. That's why there was a second sentence after the first. I wasn't arguing for putting anything on the trunk *now*. I was simply asking for consideration of my time when changes are made to emacsclient on the trunk. My Emacs-related work load has suddenly increased, and topping it with extra merging work is really not welcome. Is that an unreasonable viewpoint? > Actually, at the moment emacsclient does not > compile which _is_ a regression. And such regressions will > _certainly_ occur until we get this to compile on all platforms. Yes, the current problem is simply a side-effect of the much needed porting effort. This phase will pass soon. > It is quite too early to predict how things will progress. My > impression is that the multi-tty branch is on a good track (and it > quite helps that you are not trying to block contributions and > criticism). That's not enough to put forward a plan, but it's a good > sign. OK. --=20 Karoly --------------enig8D896C30CDAC9829A809FCCC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGSy0g6eoyqA+yej8RAi+YAJ9rI00dmvmM1b4TSYJw+M0cuEeW/wCgujws rLWlEjLied7iXzlXgUpJXis= =oOu0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8D896C30CDAC9829A809FCCC-- --===============0023630444== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel --===============0023630444==--