Jason Rumney wrote:
> Karoly Lorentey wrote:
>> Sounds promising.  The branch relies on MULTI_KBOARD being enabled; you
>> can even consider the entire branch an extension of that feature.  I
>> suggest enabling it everywhere; it has negligible costs.
> 
> It does not rely on it that much. Only a three or four such errors were
> present, and they were easily taken care of with #ifdef MULTI_KBOARD
> blocks.

OK, that sounds fine.  We can work on such niceties later, if indeed it
is a good idea at all.

> My objective at the moment is to get the w32 port compiling, linking and
> generally working with the featureset of emacs 22. That is the point
> that is required for merging to the branch I think. 

You are right; thank you for working on this.

-- 
Karoly