From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christian Herenz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Another 'best' practices question ?? Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 08:12:34 +0200 Message-ID: <463ACED2.3000006@physik.hu-berlin.de> References: <1178214443.3172.18.camel@CASE> <463A22EF.7060707@gmail.com> <1178220921.3172.31.camel@CASE> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178259206 1768 80.91.229.12 (4 May 2007 06:13:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 06:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: EMACS List To: William Case Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 04 08:13:24 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hjr2h-0006Ih-TC for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 08:13:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hjr9I-0003oy-FT for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 02:20:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hjr94-0003nL-P0 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 02:19:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hjr92-0003kl-A6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 02:19:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hjr92-0003kJ-2R for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 02:19:56 -0400 Original-Received: from irz6.physik.hu-berlin.de ([141.20.40.56] helo=mail.physik.hu-berlin.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hjr2P-0001zJ-VS for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 02:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (irz6.physik.hu-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) by mail.physik.hu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE36D1A0005; Fri, 4 May 2007 08:12:36 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] (e178243144.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.243.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.physik.hu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC501A0002; Fri, 4 May 2007 08:12:35 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070418) In-Reply-To: <1178220921.3172.31.camel@CASE> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020222 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43636 Archived-At: William Case wrote: > > I can see that my above questions, might have been particularly > newbie-dumb, but I am not the only dumb newbie out there. Might not it > have been useful to other users to see your response. I also feel a little bit stupid, when I ask questions on this list, because I am also a newbie, and in on of the last threads (How old are emacs users?) were people who use emacs for more than a decade. But I just wanted to say, that I have in my home dir's (at home and at work) a dir called emacs-scripts, where I put some of the code snippets and bigger scripts, so that path is in my load path... I do not know if that is "best practice" but I use it like that and it works. Greetz, Christian