From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vinicius Jose Latorre Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs' icon on X ? Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:26:49 -0300 Message-ID: <4628B189.7070303@ig.com.br> References: <4628AD7D.1020209@ig.com.br> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177071902 17546 80.91.229.12 (20 Apr 2007 12:25:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:25:02 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 20 14:24:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HesAX-0006yp-Ln for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:24:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HesFb-0000pj-1R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HesF2-0000Q2-HJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:29:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HesF0-0000PG-W2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:29:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HesF0-0000PA-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:29:30 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.234]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hes9w-0004OI-Qo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:24:16 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so947484wxc for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:24:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=PAX09UGE4iLBDELHzte4+tL7cV0H+kh91xjAthBbD/G4tnc6Cua4Dvdn5XifXALPnS1Mu4I0DFuzDkzz9Zo+fCswxLqf6G26+JVRDWwpJ3O0xpCOxrKRfo2HWJQia1dogrwYb1J921HeEr2aUMjsLsrBngXIUVWBiftNMng0w00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=bsHsXdpQNONsvrB6PXXuysxe00BgOtOtJrPnKSFSSWTrQb2DwGh2sITfRC0fc7/oddKQX2Fw0aCWJXq9jG9hyqdF9BygkR3Xq108cwGp5Tb0SSKhBQONXNCJhpUyVtirQ1Een+Fxezfpnzije+WLYvbUfPLHIFasL7/3yZ5hwxo= Original-Received: by 10.90.65.11 with SMTP id n11mr2863210aga.1177071856483; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?201.82.39.208? ( [201.82.39.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 6sm4260160agd.2007.04.20.05.24.14; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:24:15 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 In-Reply-To: <4628AD7D.1020209@ig.com.br> X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69682 Archived-At: Vinicius Jose Latorre wrote: > > >>> And is that an official wish? For a identical perception on all > > >>> platforms? > > > > > >> Quite so. > > > > > > Just wondering: > > > > > > $ pnginfo /usr/share/emacs/22.0.98/etc/images/icons/emacs_48.png > > > [...] > > > Software (tEXt uncompressed): Macromedia Fireworks 8 > > > [...] > > > > > > Somewhat surprising that "official" FSF icons were made with non-free > > > software. ;-) > > > > GNU Emacs is developed by volunteers, not FSF employees. > > > > On the other hand, there is no point giving Macromedia free > > advertising, so I removed the metadata. Thanks for pointing this out. > > > Well, now the icons have a white background instead of a transparent > background > (as it was before). Fixed.