From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local? Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:36:37 +0200 Message-ID: <460E47C5.5080308@gmail.com> References: <460DB19B.30102@gmail.com> <460E25B2.3050001@gmail.com> <460E38DF.9060807@gmail.com> <460E3E83.3080408@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175341007 32590 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2007 11:36:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 31 13:36:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HXbst-00032M-Hh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:36:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXbvg-0005SQ-Sx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:39:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HXbvd-0005S6-Mr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:39:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HXbvb-0005Rq-ID for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:39:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXbvb-0005Rn-E5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:39:27 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HXbsn-0007Zn-5o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:36:33 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:62361 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HXbsl-0003Qr-4a; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:36:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000729-1, 2007-03-30), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HXbsl-0003Qr-4a. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1HXbsl-0003Qr-4a 894eafb36fc96ffab39fcaf8b706a1a6 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68835 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab wrote: > "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > >> Are you sure this true even if kill-all-local-variables are called from >> post-command-hook or from a timer? If so can you please explain to me why? > > It doesn't matter anyway, since pending-undo-list isn't buffer-local in > the first place. Thanks, looks like a good argument here.