From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: how to prevent font-lock from messing with a portion of text? Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 05:31:23 +0200 Message-ID: <4605ED0B.7020401@gmail.com> References: <46048573.4010305@gmail.com> <4604DF32.3070902@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174793539 32101 80.91.229.12 (25 Mar 2007 03:32:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 03:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , Emacs-Devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 25 05:32:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HVJSm-0005T0-Le for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 05:32:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVJUr-0002C1-Of for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:34:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HVJUo-00029e-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:34:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HVJUm-00022A-61 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:34:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HVJUl-000223-Vr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:34:16 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HVJSg-0007hV-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:63157 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HVJSZ-0003pF-6K; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 05:32:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000727-1, 2007-03-23), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HVJSZ-0003pF-6K. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1HVJSZ-0003pF-6K 8729ec5a79c861d6e03eb2fa137dd933 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68520 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >>>> A problem with this solution is however that fontification must use >>>> font-lock-fontify-region-function etc. All major modes does not do that. >>> Huh? Which mode doesn't obey font-lock-fontify-region-function? >> nxml-mode. Though it is not part of Emacs many people think it is the best >> mode for editing XML. > > But it doesn't use font-lock either, so no amount of fixing font-lock will > help it, right? Yes, I believe so. I does its own fontification and I do not belive it has something in the fontification routines it uses that resembles font-lock-fontify-region-function. Unfortunately.