From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: how to prevent font-lock from messing with a portion of text? Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:20:02 +0100 Message-ID: <4604DF32.3070902@gmail.com> References: <46048573.4010305@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174724485 9950 80.91.229.12 (24 Mar 2007 08:21:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 08:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , Emacs-Devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 24 09:21:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HV1Uz-0006va-Li for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:21:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HV1Wy-00044b-9P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 03:23:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HV1Wu-00044M-Cn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 04:23:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HV1Ws-000447-PJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 04:23:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HV1Ws-000443-KW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 03:23:14 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HV1Ur-0004fh-BC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 04:21:09 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:59811 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HV1US-0006jV-6L; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:20:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000727-1, 2007-03-23), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HV1US-0006jV-6L. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1HV1US-0006jV-6L b8446757ee7273feed3a69a9adabd338 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68456 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> A problem with this solution is however that fontification must use >> font-lock-fontify-region-function etc. All major modes does not do that. > > Huh? Which mode doesn't obey font-lock-fontify-region-function? nxml-mode. Though it is not part of Emacs many people think it is the best mode for editing XML.