From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs pretest bug reports Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:12:36 +0100 Message-ID: <45EE65E4.8020604@swipnet.se> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173251635 23455 80.91.229.12 (7 Mar 2007 07:13:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 07 08:13:49 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HOqLM-0004iN-E9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:13:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOqLP-0007We-Vc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:13:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HOqLF-0007WR-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:13:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HOqLC-0007WF-PO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:13:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOqLC-0007W4-JG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:13:38 -0500 Original-Received: from av9-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net ([81.228.9.185]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HOqL7-0006IQ-Pt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:13:34 -0500 Original-Received: by av9-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 459BE3812C; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:13:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.101]) by av9-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201D538082; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:13:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from husetbladh.homeip.net (81-235-205-78-no59.tbcn.telia.com [81.235.205.78]) by smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C661237E43; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:13:30 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67487 Archived-At: Drew Adams skrev: >> There is a suggestion that we make emacs-pretest-bug an alias for >> emacs-devel. That means pretest bug reports will come here first. >> >> Does anyone think this is a bad idea? > > Not necessarily. But why not keep it separate. Emacs developers who are > interested can subscribe to that list. And people who are not interested > won't see that traffic. Usually the people that can fix the bugs that come from emacs-pretest-bug are on emacs-devel. And often emacs-devel needs to be included in the discussion as well if the bug is not easily fixed. I think having two lists is redundant, we need only one. Jan D.