From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:00:44 +0100
Message-ID: <45E6F8AC.8090601@gmail.com>
References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>	<E1HLWWC-0005Fu-Hq@fencepost.gnu.org>	<jwvy7mlsens.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<E1HLlu0-0006gw-Dz@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<uveho3cd3.fsf@gnu.org>	<E1HLwvb-0001tq-Ja@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<ur6sb2uws.fsf@gnu.org>	<E1HMJDx-0003jE-H8@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<ud53u6mu9.fsf@gnu.org>	<E1HMgQS-0002ji-QM@fencepost.gnu.org>	<jwvps7t572v.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<85vehlot48.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172764922 32596 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2007 16:02:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
	Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, rms@gnu.org
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 01 17:01:44 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HMnix-00073m-Aq
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:01:43 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMniz-0001NT-7O
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:01:45 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMnip-0001NE-7a
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:01:35 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMnin-0001My-TZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:01:34 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMnin-0001Mv-LV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:01:33 -0500
Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52)
	id 1HMnih-0003Sv-Lm; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:01:27 -0500
Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:63857
	helo=[127.0.0.1])
	by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>)
	id 1HMnif-0000Zf-8I; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:01:26 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061207 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
In-Reply-To: <85vehlot48.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000719-0, 2007-02-28), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HMnif-0000Zf-8I.
X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1HMnif-0000Zf-8I
	0fc4c0a8530049028777b5fc9238a848
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67143
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/67143>

David Kastrup wrote:

> "double blind" only if he does not notice that (zerop (random 1)) is
> always t.

Ah, you spoiled the double blindness. The one who is using it is not 
supposed to know.