From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:44:46 +0100 Message-ID: <45E30E7E.7060901@gmx.at> References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ps7x4clj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <85irdpweuq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <45E2E3AC.6050300@gmx.at> <85fy8tuf8u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172508639 30118 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2007 16:50:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 26 17:50:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HLj3E-0004e3-TZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:50:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLj3E-0004qN-Hl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:50:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLj2W-0004bS-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:49:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLj2V-0004bF-VH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:49:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLj2V-0004b8-M9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:49:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HLj2V-0000Db-4Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:49:27 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2007 16:49:26 -0000 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18+JBlH7VQ+bK7gK+AexeeebJtCdhC3CSv6JWEb4y w/Rg== User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66862 Archived-At: >>But stealth mode does not guarantee that at all. It is completely >>irreproducible whether or not some buffer has been completely >>stealthified. > > > Agree! > > I actually think Martin's argument speaks _against_ a non-nil default > value of jit-lock-stealth-time -- no major mode should ever rely on > such convoluted behavior. Obviously. But we should be prepared to get a few more bug reports when we set this to nil.