Stefan Monnier wrote:> On the other hand, I would recommend against
adding an `intangible' property
> (as someone else suggested), because this has pretty far reaching
> consequences and thus tends to break a lot of unsuspecting code in very
> subtle ways.  In Emacs-22, such invisible text is automatically treated
> as "somewhat intangible", so you get the intangible-like behavior you want,
> but without the nasty far reaching consequences of the
> `intangible' property.

I guess I should say that I'm running Emacs 21.

Matthew Flaschen