all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* user-init-file source vs. compiled
@ 2007-02-01 15:10 Juanma Barranquero
  2007-02-01 15:46 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2007-02-01 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Emacs Devel

>From the docstring of `user-init-file':

  File name, including directory, of user's initialization file.
  If the file loaded had extension `.elc', and the corresponding source file
  exists, this variable contains the name of source file, suitable for use
  by functions like `custom-save-all' which edit the init file.

Which is true, *once* the user init file is loaded. While it loads,
`user-init-file' contains the real name of the file loaded:

------ .emacs ------
(message "user-init-file: %S" user-init-file)
--------------------

After compiling .emacs and starting Emacs, *messages* contains:

(C:\emacs\HEAD\bin\emacs.exe)
Loading encoded-kb...done
user-init-file: "c:/home/.emacs.elc"

I've been struggling to find a clear wording to explain it. Suggestions welcome.

                    /L/e/k/t/u

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 15:10 user-init-file source vs. compiled Juanma Barranquero
@ 2007-02-01 15:46 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
  2007-02-01 16:07   ` Juanma Barranquero
  2007-02-01 19:17 ` Stefan Monnier
  2007-02-01 20:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Lennart Borgman (gmail) @ 2007-02-01 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: Emacs Devel

Juanma Barranquero wrote:
>> From the docstring of `user-init-file':
> 
>  File name, including directory, of user's initialization file.
>  If the file loaded had extension `.elc', and the corresponding source file
>  exists, this variable contains the name of source file, suitable for use
>  by functions like `custom-save-all' which edit the init file.
> 
> Which is true, *once* the user init file is loaded. While it loads,
> `user-init-file' contains the real name of the file loaded:
> 
> ------ .emacs ------
> (message "user-init-file: %S" user-init-file)
> --------------------
> 
> After compiling .emacs and starting Emacs, *messages* contains:
> 
> (C:\emacs\HEAD\bin\emacs.exe)
> Loading encoded-kb...done
> user-init-file: "c:/home/.emacs.elc"
> 
> I've been struggling to find a clear wording to explain it. Suggestions 
> welcome.


What about the other way round? Changing the behaviour to what the 
documentation says? Is there any reason that user-init-file should not 
always point to the source file?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 15:46 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
@ 2007-02-01 16:07   ` Juanma Barranquero
  2007-02-01 16:21     ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2007-02-01 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lennart Borgman (gmail); +Cc: Emacs Devel

On 2/1/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:

> What about the other way round? Changing the behaviour to what the
> documentation says? Is there any reason that user-init-file should not
> always point to the source file?

I don't think `load' should worry itself on whether .emacs.el, .emacs,
_emacs.el, _emacs or .emacs.d/init.el exist.

                    /L/e/k/t/u

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 16:07   ` Juanma Barranquero
@ 2007-02-01 16:21     ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
  2007-02-01 17:04       ` Juanma Barranquero
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Lennart Borgman (gmail) @ 2007-02-01 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: Emacs Devel

Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> On 2/1/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> What about the other way round? Changing the behaviour to what the
>> documentation says? Is there any reason that user-init-file should not
>> always point to the source file?
> 
> I don't think `load' should worry itself on whether .emacs.el, .emacs,
> _emacs.el, _emacs or .emacs.d/init.el exist.


Could load-file-name be a way for a user to check in user-init-file what 
is actually loaded? Or is that not set here?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 16:21     ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
@ 2007-02-01 17:04       ` Juanma Barranquero
  2007-02-01 17:20         ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2007-02-01 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lennart Borgman (gmail); +Cc: Emacs Devel

On 2/1/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Could load-file-name be a way for a user to check in user-init-file what
> is actually loaded?

What do you mean? `user-init-file' is what is actually loaded.

> Or is that not set here?

Where? Certainly `load-file-name' is set while a file is being loaded.

                    /L/e/k/t/u

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 17:04       ` Juanma Barranquero
@ 2007-02-01 17:20         ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
  2007-02-01 18:18           ` Juanma Barranquero
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Lennart Borgman (gmail) @ 2007-02-01 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: Emacs Devel

Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> On 2/1/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Could load-file-name be a way for a user to check in user-init-file what
>> is actually loaded?
> 
> What do you mean? `user-init-file' is what is actually loaded.
> 
>> Or is that not set here?
> 
> Where? Certainly `load-file-name' is set while a file is being loaded.


I just meant that if the user want to know if he has compiled his user 
init file he/she can look at load-file-name. There is no need to give 
this information also through user-init-file during the load of 
user-init-file. So user-init-file could from that point of view point to 
the source file.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 17:20         ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
@ 2007-02-01 18:18           ` Juanma Barranquero
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2007-02-01 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lennart Borgman (gmail); +Cc: Emacs Devel

On 2/1/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:

> So user-init-file could from that point of view point to
> the source file.

At the risk of repeating myself: I don't think `load' should worry
with determining what is the right init source file.

                    /L/e/k/t/u

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 15:10 user-init-file source vs. compiled Juanma Barranquero
  2007-02-01 15:46 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
@ 2007-02-01 19:17 ` Stefan Monnier
  2007-02-01 20:02   ` Chong Yidong
  2007-02-01 20:07   ` Juanma Barranquero
  2007-02-01 20:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2007-02-01 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: Emacs Devel

>  File name, including directory, of user's initialization file.
>  If the file loaded had extension `.elc', and the corresponding source file
>  exists, this variable contains the name of source file, suitable for use
>  by functions like `custom-save-all' which edit the init file.

I think we should *strongly* recommend not to compile the .emacs file.
It's a dumb thing to do, unless you're a masochist anyway.


        Stefan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 19:17 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2007-02-01 20:02   ` Chong Yidong
  2007-02-01 22:41     ` Stefan Monnier
  2007-02-01 20:07   ` Juanma Barranquero
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Chong Yidong @ 2007-02-01 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Juanma Barranquero, Emacs Devel

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>>  File name, including directory, of user's initialization file.
>>  If the file loaded had extension `.elc', and the corresponding source file
>>  exists, this variable contains the name of source file, suitable for use
>>  by functions like `custom-save-all' which edit the init file.
>
> I think we should *strongly* recommend not to compile the .emacs file.
> It's a dumb thing to do, unless you're a masochist anyway.

Currently, the Emacs manual says

     If you have a large amount of code in your `.emacs' file, you
  should rename it to `~/.emacs.el', and byte-compile it.  *Note Byte
  Compilation: (elisp)Byte Compilation, for more information about
  compiling Emacs Lisp programs.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 19:17 ` Stefan Monnier
  2007-02-01 20:02   ` Chong Yidong
@ 2007-02-01 20:07   ` Juanma Barranquero
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2007-02-01 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Emacs Devel

On 2/1/07, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:

> I think we should *strongly* recommend not to compile the .emacs file.

Perhaps. But Emacs supports having .emacs compiled anyway, so the
docstring for `user-init-file' should be accurate.

> It's a dumb thing to do, unless you're a masochist anyway.

Why? I have a medium-sized .emacs (~1800 lines) and it loads faster
when compiled (or at least that's the feeling I get).

                    /L/e/k/t/u

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 15:10 user-init-file source vs. compiled Juanma Barranquero
  2007-02-01 15:46 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
  2007-02-01 19:17 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2007-02-01 20:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
  2007-02-01 22:06   ` Juanma Barranquero
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2007-02-01 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: emacs-devel

> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 16:10:37 +0100
> From: "Juanma Barranquero" <lekktu@gmail.com>
> 
>   File name, including directory, of user's initialization file.
>   If the file loaded had extension `.elc', and the corresponding source file
>   exists, this variable contains the name of source file, suitable for use
>   by functions like `custom-save-all' which edit the init file.
> 
> Which is true, *once* the user init file is loaded. While it loads,
> `user-init-file' contains the real name of the file loaded:
> 
> ------ .emacs ------
> (message "user-init-file: %S" user-init-file)
> --------------------
> 
> After compiling .emacs and starting Emacs, *messages* contains:
> 
> (C:\emacs\HEAD\bin\emacs.exe)
> Loading encoded-kb...done
> user-init-file: "c:/home/.emacs.elc"
> 
> I've been struggling to find a clear wording to explain it. Suggestions welcome.

How about adding this to the doc string:

  While Emacs loads and evaluates the init file, value is the real
  name of the file, regardless of whether or not it has the `.elc'
  extension.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 20:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2007-02-01 22:06   ` Juanma Barranquero
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2007-02-01 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: emacs-devel

On 2/1/07, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

> How about adding this to the doc string:

Thanks!

                    /L/e/k/t/u

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 20:02   ` Chong Yidong
@ 2007-02-01 22:41     ` Stefan Monnier
  2007-02-01 23:03       ` Juanma Barranquero
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2007-02-01 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chong Yidong; +Cc: Juanma Barranquero, Emacs Devel

>>> File name, including directory, of user's initialization file.
>>> If the file loaded had extension `.elc', and the corresponding source file
>>> exists, this variable contains the name of source file, suitable for use
>>> by functions like `custom-save-all' which edit the init file.
>> 
>> I think we should *strongly* recommend not to compile the .emacs file.
>> It's a dumb thing to do, unless you're a masochist anyway.

> Currently, the Emacs manual says

>      If you have a large amount of code in your `.emacs' file, you
>   should rename it to `~/.emacs.el', and byte-compile it.  *Note Byte
>   Compilation: (elisp)Byte Compilation, for more information about
>   compiling Emacs Lisp programs.

I clearly disagree.  If there's no loop in your .emacs, then byte-compiling
won't bring you any benefit.  And if there are loops and byte-compiling is
important to make them fast enough, then you should most likely take those
things out of your .emacs and move them to a separate file/package.


        Stefan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 22:41     ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2007-02-01 23:03       ` Juanma Barranquero
  2007-02-02 15:30         ` Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2007-02-01 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Chong Yidong, Emacs Devel

On 2/1/07, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:

> I clearly disagree.  If there's no loop in your .emacs, then byte-compiling
> won't bring you any benefit.

It's not about the code being faster, is about the .elc being smaller
(about 10% smaller) than the .el.

> then you should most likely take those
> things out of your .emacs and move them to a separate file/package.

Why? You prefer it that way, OK, do that. I don't like having lots of
small .el files loaded from .emacs; it's easier to maintain it
up-to-date between two or more computers when it's a single file.

                    /L/e/k/t/u

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-01 23:03       ` Juanma Barranquero
@ 2007-02-02 15:30         ` Stefan Monnier
  2007-02-02 16:03           ` Juanma Barranquero
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2007-02-02 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: Chong Yidong, Emacs Devel

>> I clearly disagree.  If there's no loop in your .emacs, then byte-compiling
>> won't bring you any benefit.
> It's not about the code being faster, is about the .elc being smaller
> (about 10% smaller) than the .el.

10% smaller will result in a non-measurably faster load, and will still take
90% more disk space.  So what's the advantage again?

>> then you should most likely take those things out of your .emacs and move
>> them to a separate file/package.

> Why? You prefer it that way, OK, do that. I don't like having lots of
> small .el files loaded from .emacs; it's easier to maintain it
> up-to-date between two or more computers when it's a single file.

I don't want to make it impossible to byte-compile your .emacs.  If that's
really what you want, go for it.  I'm just saying that we should discourage
people from doing that, because too many users think "oh Emacs takes a long
time to start, I bet if I byte-compile it it'll start faster", but it turns
out it's not faster and next time they forget to re-compile their .emacs
they get bitten.  It's not the most common problem on gnu.emacs.help, but
it's sufficiently common that I think the potential very minor advantage(s)
is just not worth it.

OTOH I'm in favor of adding some kind of hack so that the .emacs file
automatically goes through the byte-compiler's sanity checks when you save
it (so they user might can warnings about using obsolete
variables/functions).


        Stefan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-02 15:30         ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2007-02-02 16:03           ` Juanma Barranquero
  2007-02-02 16:30             ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
  2007-02-02 16:47             ` Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2007-02-02 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Chong Yidong, Emacs Devel

On 2/2/07, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:

> 10% smaller will result in a non-measurably faster load, and will still take
> 90% more disk space.  So what's the advantage again?

The wonderful, perhaps subjective feeling that it is loading faster :)

> I don't want to make it impossible to byte-compile your .emacs.  If that's
> really what you want, go for it.

I've been using Emacs for nine years and I just started to
byte-compile my .emacs a week ago, so it's not a matter of me "really
wanting". This thread was about a variable's description being
inaccurate (fortunately it is now fixed).

> I'm just saying that we should discourage
> people from doing that, because too many users think "oh Emacs takes a long
> time to start, I bet if I byte-compile it it'll start faster", but it turns
> out it's not faster and next time they forget to re-compile their .emacs
> they get bitten.

I've added this to my site-start.el:

(catch 'init-file
  (dolist (source-file '("~/.emacs.el" "~/.emacs." "~/_emacs.el"
                         "~/_emacs" "~/.emacs.d/init.el"))
    (when (file-exists-p source-file)
      (require 'bytecomp)
      (unless (fboundp 'time-less-p) (require 'time-date))
      (let ((byte-file (byte-compile-dest-file source-file)))
        (when (and (file-exists-p byte-file)
                   (time-less-p (nth 5 (file-attributes byte-file))
                                (nth 5 (file-attributes source-file))))
          (unless (byte-compile-file source-file)
            (setq init-file-user nil))))
      (throw 'init-file t))))

which recompiles my .emacs.el if needed (the compilation log is quite
visible, so I don't miss that something happened), with the added
benefit that .emacs(.elc?)? is not loaded if the compilation fails.

> It's not the most common problem on gnu.emacs.help, but
> it's sufficiently common that I think the potential very minor advantage(s)
> is just not worth it.

By all means, if you think users should not compile their .emacs
unless they know what they're doing, just add a prominent notice to
the relevant docs. You're talking about what should we recommend; I
was just talking about not misleading people, given the fact that
bytecompiling .emacs is *allowed*. I have no opinion on whether we
should en- or discourage bytecompiling the init file.

> OTOH I'm in favor of adding some kind of hack so that the .emacs file
> automatically goes through the byte-compiler's sanity checks when you save
> it (so they user might can warnings about using obsolete
> variables/functions).

That's a really nice idea.

                    /L/e/k/t/u

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-02 16:03           ` Juanma Barranquero
@ 2007-02-02 16:30             ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
  2007-02-02 16:38               ` Juanma Barranquero
  2007-02-02 16:47             ` Stefan Monnier
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Lennart Borgman (gmail) @ 2007-02-02 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: Chong Yidong, Stefan Monnier, Emacs Devel

Juanma Barranquero wrote:

>> OTOH I'm in favor of adding some kind of hack so that the .emacs file
>> automatically goes through the byte-compiler's sanity checks when you 
>> save
>> it (so they user might can warnings about using obsolete
>> variables/functions).
> 
> That's a really nice idea.


But is not a lot more elisp modules loaded at that time? (Though perhaps 
you can workaround that too.)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-02 16:30             ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
@ 2007-02-02 16:38               ` Juanma Barranquero
  2007-02-02 17:15                 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2007-02-02 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lennart Borgman (gmail); +Cc: Chong Yidong, Stefan Monnier, Emacs Devel

On 2/2/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:

> But is not a lot more elisp modules loaded at that time?

A few modules, yes, but do you really save .emacs that much?

                    /L/e/k/t/u

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-02 16:03           ` Juanma Barranquero
  2007-02-02 16:30             ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
@ 2007-02-02 16:47             ` Stefan Monnier
  2007-02-02 17:08               ` Juanma Barranquero
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2007-02-02 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: Chong Yidong, Emacs Devel

> This thread was about a variable's description being
> inaccurate (fortunately it is now fixed).

Yes, and I'm glad it's been fixed.  I just hijacked the thread for some
other (related) purpose.
We don't seem to be in disagreement.


        Stefan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-02 16:47             ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2007-02-02 17:08               ` Juanma Barranquero
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2007-02-02 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Chong Yidong, Emacs Devel

On 2/2/07, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:

> We don't seem to be in disagreement.

I don't think so, no.

                    /L/e/k/t/u

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-02 16:38               ` Juanma Barranquero
@ 2007-02-02 17:15                 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
  2007-02-02 17:21                   ` Juanma Barranquero
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Lennart Borgman (gmail) @ 2007-02-02 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: Chong Yidong, Stefan Monnier, Emacs Devel

Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> But is not a lot more elisp modules loaded at that time?
> 
> A few modules, yes, but do you really save .emacs that much?


Eh, no, but I have usually loaded it before I save it ... ;-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

* Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
  2007-02-02 17:15                 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
@ 2007-02-02 17:21                   ` Juanma Barranquero
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2007-02-02 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lennart Borgman (gmail); +Cc: Chong Yidong, Stefan Monnier, Emacs Devel

On 2/2/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Eh, no, but I have usually loaded it before I save it ... ;-)

Hmm. I don't understand. Stefan proposed a mechanism to check .emacs
when it is written. What's that got to do with when/how you load it?

                    /L/e/k/t/u

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-02 17:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-01 15:10 user-init-file source vs. compiled Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-01 15:46 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-02-01 16:07   ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-01 16:21     ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-02-01 17:04       ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-01 17:20         ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-02-01 18:18           ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-01 19:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-01 20:02   ` Chong Yidong
2007-02-01 22:41     ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-01 23:03       ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-02 15:30         ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-02 16:03           ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-02 16:30             ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-02-02 16:38               ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-02 17:15                 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-02-02 17:21                   ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-02 16:47             ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-02 17:08               ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-01 20:07   ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-01 20:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-01 22:06   ` Juanma Barranquero

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.