From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-warning-face hard to read because it is bold Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:01:37 +0100 Message-ID: <45AF3771.5000108@gmail.com> References: <45AEB7D7.8060806@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169110926 12440 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2007 09:02:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 18 10:02:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H7T9n-0002Do-4v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:02:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7T9n-0000EJ-Rr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:02:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H7T9Z-0000BM-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:01:49 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H7T9X-00009c-PW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:01:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7T9X-00009W-LO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:01:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.212] (helo=ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H7T9V-0002Lh-Qr; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:01:46 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:64905 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H7T9T-0008Cm-5J; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:01:44 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0703-3, 2007-01-17), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1H7T9T-0008Cm-5J. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1H7T9T-0008Cm-5J 495b4ebd4e71202c05c1dbf886fea75a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65271 Archived-At: Kenichi Handa wrote: >>> - I am quite a bit surprised that Eli and Jason found the font on the >>> picture I sent satisfactory. Could it be that it looks different on your >>> displays? > >> I don't know. All we have is the image you sent, and it looks fine on >> my display. > > Me too. > > Please note that what you sent is an captured screen image > which is what your computer want to display, not the actual > image you see on your screen. > > So it may be displayed badly on a ill-tuned display, but > displayed clearly on a well-tuned display. Thanks. I am using a TFT display, but do you know if this could difference happen because of a somewhat bad display driver too?