From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C file recoginzed as image file Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:05:35 +0100 Message-ID: <45A43BDF.5070508@gmail.com> References: <45A427C9.9090702@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168391219 26000 80.91.229.12 (10 Jan 2007 01:06:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, c.a.rendle@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 10 02:06:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H4Rvc-0002NS-E4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:06:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4Rvb-0005Jd-UY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:06:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H4RuO-000449-Uk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:05:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H4RuN-00041M-7G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:05:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4RuN-00041E-1b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:05:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.212] (helo=ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H4RuL-0004bU-2o; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:05:37 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:64235 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4RuI-0003K9-6P; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:05:35 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Original-To: Chris Moore In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0702-0, 2007-01-09), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1H4RuI-0003K9-6P. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1H4RuI-0003K9-6P cfa8991ad72f1b06d563700ec9087027 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65101 Archived-At: Chris Moore wrote: > "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > >> Chris Moore wrote: >> >>> In this case X/Y is 1/30,000,000 or so. Was it worth wasting all that >>> time scanning 29,999,999 clean files to prevent just one virus being >>> installed? What price is the average user willing to pay to prevent >>> having their keypresses logged and transferred to a stranger, or to >>> prevent their Internet banking details being stolen? >> Absolutely. The important figure here is 1. 1 virus found (or more). > > I just noticed - I think I may be been doing the same thing that > annoyed Richard a couple of days ago; what he called "sarcastic". I > don't mean to ask "was it worth wasting all that time ..." - of course > it was. Seems I speak wih forked-tongue. Mistakes makes things very much clearer sometimes ;-)