From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C file recoginzed as image file Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:55:47 +0100 Message-ID: <45A40F63.5070605@gmail.com> References: <45A2D32A.8020804@gmail.com> <45A3650B.80504@gmail.com> <45A3771B.5070108@gnu.org> <45A38409.9080402@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168379776 24157 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2007 21:56:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dooglus@gmail.com, c.a.rendle@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 09 22:56:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H4Owy-0002UO-Mt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:56:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4Owx-00080l-Vd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:56:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H4Owg-0007zR-KW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:55:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H4Owe-0007xC-PL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:55:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4Owe-0007wy-H3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:55:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.213] (helo=ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H4Owc-0005vq-Th; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:55:47 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:62967 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4Owa-0002N9-8O; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:55:45 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0702-0, 2007-01-09), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1H4Owa-0002N9-8O. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1H4Owa-0002N9-8O fbd2ec14698e4f8bd23fadc3338965d0 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65082 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:01:13 +0100 >> From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" >> CC: rms@gnu.org, dooglus@gmail.com, lekktu@gmail.com, >> c.a.rendle@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, >> storm@cua.dk, eliz@gnu.org >>> it does not >>> make sense to use a completely different set of image libraries on MS >>> Windows than on other platforms. >> In my opinion it definitively does. It enhances the security for the users. > > Who says that Microsoft libraries are more secure than the ones we > use? There's no evidence that this is even remotely true. Yes, who said that?