From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7 Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:07:15 +0000 Message-ID: <459BB893.9010106@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167833269 9707 80.91.229.12 (3 Jan 2007 14:07:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 03 15:07:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H26mN-00055d-NR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:07:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H26mN-00049p-79 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:07:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H26m7-00049j-13 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:07:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H26m5-00048v-GW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:07:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H26m5-00048r-Bk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:07:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail1.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H26m2-00053q-8l; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:07:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01D955C2B; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:07:21 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64688 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> This conflict arose because the designers of Windows >> did not concern themselves with how Emacs used these characters. >> I suggest that at least the above sentence must be removed, as it incorrectly gives the designers of Windows credit for the CUA standard. In fact, I suggest that advertising Windows in this text and including it in a Windows specific section of the manual is inappropriate, as many systems now use the control key as the default modifier for their CUA keybindings (Gnome and KDE for example). > To add insult to injury, the ChangeLog entry accuses me of being > lopsided towards Windows: > I think you're reading too much into that text, it does not imply any accusation to me.