From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: National Language Support Functions Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:36:58 +0100 Message-ID: <4596A3BA.8000501@gmail.com> References: <458AB581.7090303@student.lu.se> <459536C5.4090503@gmail.com> <45957190.9030801@student.lu.se> <45957F23.8040409@gmail.com> <45958D3B.4060207@gmail.com> <45959540.407@gmail.com> <459683EA.2040902@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167500258 2998 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2006 17:37:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 30 18:37:37 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H0i9E-00051K-3E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:37:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0i9D-0001V6-KX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:37:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0i8j-0001IN-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:37:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0i8i-0001Hk-IF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0i8i-0001Hd-Cf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.213] (helo=ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H0i8h-0002hf-2E; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:65193 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H0i8e-0006gQ-9G; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:36:57 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0665-0, 2006-12-29), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1H0i8e-0006gQ-9G. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1H0i8e-0006gQ-9G 013d2665ad099561418f2c55e4352606 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64507 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:21:14 +0100 >> From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" >> CC: Juanma Barranquero , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-07/msg00467.html >>> >>> and the discussion that followed. >>> >> Did not I explain why that argument is not valid here? >> > > You said: > > "I would not suggest using it if I believed that." > > This hardly qualifies as explaining why my argument ``is not valid''. > I can not see why you think that is the explanation? Instead of explaining it all myself I gave you some links to other pages that described the situation. > >> If you take a look at the code you will see that very little will >> have to change to allow this hook. >> > > What I said back then had nothing to do with how easy or hard is it to > allow your hook. I was talking about long-term maintenance burden, > not short-term amount of work. > Yes, that is true and a very good argument. I just happen to disagree on the amount of maintenance burden.