From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: National Language Support Functions Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:30:32 +0100 Message-ID: <4596A238.8010408@gmail.com> References: <458AB581.7090303@student.lu.se> <459536C5.4090503@gmail.com> <45957190.9030801@student.lu.se> <45957F23.8040409@gmail.com> <45958D3B.4060207@gmail.com> <45959540.407@gmail.com> <4595AF66.2030602@gmail.com> <45968B7C.2020306@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167499853 2109 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2006 17:30:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 17:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 30 18:30:51 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H0i2j-0004MC-VK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:30:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0i2j-0008Hx-Bl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:30:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0i2a-0008Hg-G1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:30:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0i2V-0008HJ-UO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:30:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0i2V-0008H9-MH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:30:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.212] (helo=ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H0i2U-0001sv-EF; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:30:34 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:65155 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H0i2S-0003hQ-4t; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:30:33 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0665-0, 2006-12-29), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1H0i2S-0003hQ-4t. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1H0i2S-0003hQ-4t 7708e77658cd932209970720f7f4c42a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64506 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I didn't miss your argument, I was reflecting on the _way_ you > _present_ your arguments. If you say that some principle is > important, then please follow that principle even if it is > inconvenient for your own arguments. > Indeed I do. I said you cannot follow the guidelines. I said some ways to diverge from them were worse than other ways. > They don't have that alternative in other Windows programs, except by > remapping the keycodes. I don't see why Emacs should be different. > My point is that Emacs should be different because it steeles the very important Alt key.