From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: gnu vs. xemacs Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 13:57:51 +0100 Message-ID: <45926DCF.6030404@gmail.com> References: <1167219981.424569.215160@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167224300 8627 80.91.229.10 (27 Dec 2006 12:58:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 27 13:58:16 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GzYMK-00069D-KU for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 13:58:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GzYMK-0006PO-8y for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 07:58:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GzYLu-00069q-55 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 07:57:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GzYLs-00067U-C6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 07:57:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GzYLs-00067D-3F for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 07:57:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.213] (helo=ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GzYLr-0007tt-Hv for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 07:57:47 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:65217 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GzYLp-0007lW-86; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 13:57:46 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Original-To: "H." In-Reply-To: <1167219981.424569.215160@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0663-0, 2006-12-27), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1GzYLp-0007lW-86. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1GzYLp-0007lW-86 cc0962ef98258014ec77ccfdcb35a48d X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:39946 Archived-At: H. wrote: > I was just curious why people in this community prefer gnu over xemacs, > or if that is the case, and, whatever your preference is, why you feel > that way. I'm neutral myself, being just a beginner. All opinions > welcome. For instance, perhaps these difference forks are good for > different things...? See http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/EmacsAndXEmacs