From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, jasonr@gnu.org,
"Kim F. Storm" <storm@cua.dk>,
eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: How about a new pretest?
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:42:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <458D94C6.80100@student.lu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1GyDFK-0008Tw-Ro@fencepost.gnu.org>
Richard Stallman wrote:
> > The reason is that improving
> > Emacs for Windows alone is not as important as improving it for free systems.
>
> IMO, it is not "improving for Windows alone" ... it is a matter of making
> the Windows port work like the other ports.
>
> Right, but that is lower priority than making Emacs work better on GNU.
> I usually don't spend time on Windows issues myself, and I hope you too
> will leave them to others.
I understand the priority, but I think we also should take into account
that there currently are a bigger amount of bugs on the w32 side.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-23 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-18 17:02 How about a new pretest? Juanma Barranquero
2006-12-18 17:54 ` Chong Yidong
2006-12-18 19:38 ` Nick Roberts
2006-12-18 20:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-12-19 0:46 ` Juanma Barranquero
2006-12-18 20:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-12-19 10:13 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-19 15:41 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-19 20:30 ` Chong Yidong
2006-12-19 22:37 ` Lennart Borgman
2006-12-19 22:40 ` Juanma Barranquero
2006-12-20 15:04 ` David Kastrup
2006-12-20 15:23 ` Juanma Barranquero
2006-12-20 13:01 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-21 10:47 ` Jason Rumney
2006-12-21 13:41 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-21 23:18 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-22 0:34 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-22 21:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-12-23 20:13 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-25 13:30 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-12-23 20:13 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-23 20:42 ` Lennart Borgman [this message]
2006-12-24 17:09 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-24 17:22 ` Lennart Borgman
2006-12-21 23:18 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=458D94C6.80100@student.lu.se \
--to=lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se \
--cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jasonr@gnu.org \
--cc=lekktu@gmail.com \
--cc=storm@cua.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.