From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIERqw6Rydg==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs? Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:14:46 +0100 Message-ID: <45896F86.7080601@swipnet.se> References: <45878CD9.7020703@swipnet.se> <45884D35.7090402@swipnet.se> <45895E29.4050203@swipnet.se> <87y7p2zfi7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166634965 27532 80.91.229.10 (20 Dec 2006 17:16:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Leo , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 20 18:16:01 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gx52v-0004Uf-4E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:16:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gx52u-00047k-Hw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:16:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gx52W-0003yq-P3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:15:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gx52V-0003xA-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:15:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gx52U-0003wy-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:15:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.228.9.186] (helo=av9-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gx52U-000239-DV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:15:34 -0500 Original-Received: by av9-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id CC57537FD0; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:15:33 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.102]) by av9-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A264837E4C; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:15:33 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from husetbladh.homeip.net (81-235-205-78-no59.tbcn.telia.com [81.235.205.78]) by smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E9A37E49; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:15:33 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025) Original-To: Chong Yidong In-Reply-To: <87y7p2zfi7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64018 Archived-At: Chong Yidong skrev: > Jan Dj=C3=A4rv writes: >=20 >> Leo skrev: >>> * Jan Dj=C3=A4rv (2006-12-19 21:36 +0100) said: >>> ^^^^^^^^^ >>>> It does indeed look like -lXt is needed to detect X11. This is all >>>> in autoconfig, the macro AC_PATH_X. I guess we could file a bug >>>> report on autoconfig. -lXt is not needed for Gtk+. >>> Thank you for looking into this :-) >> I looked at the sources for autoconf, and this bug has been fixed in >> autoconf 2.61: >> >> Revision 1.22 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs] >> Sat Aug 12 18:33:46 2006 UTC (4 months, 1 week ago) by eggert >> Branch: MAIN >> CVS Tags: AUTOCONF-2_60a >> Changes since 1.21: +1 -1 lines >> Diff to previous 1.21 >> >> * lib/autoconf/libs.m4 (AC_PATH_X_DIRECT): Replace another >> check for libXt by a check for libX11. >> >> Unfortunately I used 2.60 when I generated configure. >=20 > I regenerate configure each time I roll a pretest tarball, using > autoconf 2.59. As I understand, this is the "safe" version of > autoconf we've been using all through the release process. >=20 I guess we just have to document this in PROBLEMS then. BTW, what is uns= afe=20 with 2.60 or 2.61? Did someone have problems with those? Jan D.