From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with the url package on w32? Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:04:47 +0100 Message-ID: <45887E1F.8050402@student.lu.se> References: <871wnnclkz.fsf@freemail.hu> <87lkltztzy.fsf@freemail.hu> <871wniv89d.fsf@freemail.hu> <87wt5825wh.fsf@freemail.hu> <45887987.3040105@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166573234 30675 80.91.229.10 (20 Dec 2006 00:07:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 20 01:07:13 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GwozI-00077w-Vg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:07:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwozI-0002PR-FU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:07:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gwoz8-0002P8-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gwoz7-0002Os-83 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gwoz7-0002Op-56 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:07:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.213] (helo=ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Gwowu-0003Ea-EA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:04:44 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:60289 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gwows-0005YE-8T; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:04:43 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0660-0, 2006-12-19), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Gwows-0005YE-8T. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1Gwows-0005YE-8T f792b00a5fc7ded992e6b9bda470c3fa X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63974 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On 12/20/06, Lennart Borgman wrote: > >> There seem to be a bug here on some level. Has anyone else seen this? > > I never apply a patch from inside Emacs. When the patch is not kosher > (spaces changed by your e-mail program, crlf/lf issues, etc.) it is > perfectly possible to get "hunk applied" messages for hunks that > weren't really applied. > > /L/e/k/t/u So I am not alone in seeing the problem at least. But (oh, this is memories from the past!) since it is only text files we patch here why are cr-lf etc a problem? Can't ediff-patch handle these for us? (And we take the responsibility for ignoring spaces - I guess there is ediff support for this in this case too?)