From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: I feel strange after several days of using emacs Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:05:01 +0100 Message-ID: <457C929D.1040502@student.lu.se> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165791952 20738 80.91.229.10 (10 Dec 2006 23:05:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 11 00:05:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GtXjX-0005hz-KQ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:05:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GtXjW-00024p-OT for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:05:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GtXjK-00024Y-7m for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GtXjI-000248-IZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:05:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GtXjI-000245-EW for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:05:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.213] (helo=ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GtXjH-0001z3-TO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:05:08 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:63109 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GtXjF-0006js-9G; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:05:06 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) Original-To: Ronald In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0655-1, 2006-12-08), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1GtXjF-0006js-9G. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1GtXjF-0006js-9G cad9c332ea79805b8f656aa7b81fb699 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:39397 Archived-At: Ronald wrote: > When I edit in a editor other than emacs, I will typed the hotkeys in > emacs automatically. For example, when I'm write this email in > thunderbird, I typed C-b C-j etc. Then I will think to choose to write > email in emacs, and at last do everything that need editing in emacs, > or typing mistake occurs time by time. But emacs can't do everything > properly. So I'm thinking whether I should quit. But vim has the same > problem, and others are not so convenient for programming... It's hard > to choose. Who can give me any suggestion? This is one of the reasons I use cua-mode in Emacs. But it helps just a bit of course ;-)