From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:03:36 +0100 Message-ID: <45616158.1030807@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1164009747 31897 80.91.229.2 (20 Nov 2006 08:02:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 20 09:02:25 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gm46h-0005Jy-Al for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:02:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gm46h-00073R-15 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:02:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gm46V-00073J-8d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:02:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gm46T-000733-TR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:02:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gm46T-000730-Kj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:02:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gm46S-0005zt-Ng for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:02:09 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2006 08:02:08 -0000 Original-Received: from N761P010.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.39.10]) [62.47.39.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 20 Nov 2006 09:02:08 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en Original-To: Herbert Euler In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62541 Archived-At: > Having read your new definition of `longlines-wrap-region', > how about making the value of the `display' property more > sophisticated? I see in the ``Other Display Specs'' section > in the elisp manual that display specifications can be > conditional. How about letting it take care of fill-column > and window width? That's been the idea behind my proposal. In addition, the display property could accommodate leading spaces to align continuation lines with the original line and highlight such spaces in a different face. However, if Kim plans to incorporate a longlines-like feature in the redisplay engine we really shouldn't bother.