From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Brooks Moses Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.comp.gcc.fortran Subject: Re: gfortran error format (was: Re: Emacs and GFortran) Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:21:09 -0800 Organization: Stanford University Message-ID: <454AFBF5.60108@codesourcery.com> References: <19c433eb0611020608v3695ef7ex7cbe998347760d19@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162556202 21230 80.91.229.2 (3 Nov 2006 12:16:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 12:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, wt@atmos.colostate.edu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 03 13:16:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfxyI-00021X-Qg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:16:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfxyI-0004Iu-4G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 07:16:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gfueh-0005BH-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 03:44:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gfued-00059U-8v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 03:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfueV-00058C-PV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 03:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [171.67.20.25] (helo=smtp2.stanford.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GfueU-00048n-PX; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 03:43:51 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp2.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 139D24C956; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 00:21:14 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [171.66.164.206] (DNab42a4ce.Stanford.EDU [171.66.164.206]) by smtp2.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA1D4C7D0; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 00:21:12 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: fortran@gcc.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 07:07:18 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61684 gmane.comp.gcc.fortran:15414 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > If someone wants to propose a complete patch (against subversion > mainline) that works, regression-tests fine, please send it and it > will be reviewed like any other patch. > > A change to make GFortran comply with GNU standards should be reviewed > for correctness, of course, but not "like any other patch". > Maintainers should keep in mind that this is a problem that needs to > be fixed. If users don't provide a suitable patch, the maintainers > should procure for one to be written. Well, most of the other GFortran patches are also for problems that need to be fixed. :) In any case, I believe that the patch I checked into the GCC mainline a few hours ago fixes the important parts of this particular problem, and you should find that the error messages are now properly parsable without special treatment. If that's still not the case, please let me know. - Brooks