From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Crash force-deleting the only frame Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:35:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4548CCE6.6010209@student.lu.se> References: <87irhzopsv.fsf@cs.cmu.edu> <87lkmvp4pz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87u01ji1ga.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162399016 20460 80.91.229.2 (1 Nov 2006 16:36:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, Michael Welsh Duggan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 01 17:36:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfJ4n-0002t3-Fs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:36:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfJ4n-00089o-2F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:36:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GfJ4Z-00088M-W9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:36:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GfJ4V-00087L-Ar for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:36:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfJ4V-00087F-7J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:36:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.212] (helo=ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GfJ4P-0003Pg-G6; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:36:05 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-249-218-244.bredband.comhem.se ([83.249.218.244]:63203 helo=[192.168.123.121]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GfJ4J-0001ij-3H; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:35:59 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) Original-To: Chong Yidong In-Reply-To: <87u01ji1ga.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1GfJ4J-0001ij-3H. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1GfJ4J-0001ij-3H 1a7571445841a2228efe0247024583e7 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61557 Archived-At: Chong Yidong wrote: > "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > > >> On 11/1/06, Chong Yidong wrote: >> >> >>> The sit-for isn't necessary; >>> >>> emacs --eval "(delete-frame (selected-frame) t)" >>> >> I know. I added it to be sure the frame was fully created and >> displayed before trying to delete it. >> > > Okay, I looked at this, and now I'm not sure there's any bug. If you > specify an --eval command-line arg that deletes the only frame, what > else could Emacs possibly do other than abort execution? "Fatal error > (6)Aborted" is an abort; it's not really a crash. > It could behave the same way it does as when you execute this code in the scratch buffer (after just starting with emacs -Q).