Re: Bug Database?

["Jan Djärv" <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>]

Nick Roberts skrev:
>  > >  I think the important thing is that reported bugs don't get lost
>  > > between the cracks, not that every bug is fixed before the release.
>  > 
>  > We've been through this before.  Everyone agrees with your statement
>  > except RMS.
> 
> Yes, but I'm also suggesting use of a bug database to ensure that reported bugs
> don't get lost.  That has also come up before and was considered unnecessary,
> but at that time reported bugs were only recorded in the archives.
> 

FWIW I think such a database (Bugzilla?) would help.  Right now I have bugs 
that shall be fixed to the release (just found out I forgot to do the UTF-8 in 
selection thingy), bugs/features that are for after the release, and bugs that 
are hard to reproduce, but are on some kind of watch-list.

A database would be a good place to clearly mark the type of bug/feature 
request, and the planned release.  A more structured FOR-RELEASE, but not just 
for the next release.  It would hopefully be easier to search and browse than 
my inbox + Emacs mailing lists.

	Jan D.