Originally posted some of this to help-gnu-emacs. It was suggested that I post here to emacs-devel. I've also posted a version of this to the cygwin mailing list (no responses yet). I've recently upgraded my cygwin installation to 1.5.21. Since then, I have had no luck getting emacs to run. I've tried the stock 21.2 that comes with the cygwin distribution, the test 21.3 that was posted a while back, and I've even downloaded and (well half) built the latest sources from the emacs CVS repository. I can't get past the first execution of bootstrap-emacs.exe. The problem is that emacs just hangs and takes up gobs of CPU. I ultimately tracked this down to a tight infinite loop in _malloc_internal (gmalloc.c). For some reason, align (also in gmalloc.c) is returning a pointer that is smaller than _heapbase. The calculation to determine what block the newly requested memory is in (BLOCK(result+size)) returns a ridiculously huge number. Since _malloc_internal incrementally doubles the new size of the heap until the requested memory fits, at some point the multiplication overflows and newsize gets a value of 0. Since 0 * 2 is always zero, the test for BLOCK(result+size) > newsize always succeeds and _malloc_internal gets stuck in a tight loop multiplying 0 by 2 forever. For example, _heapbase is something around 0x203f4000, but align (really sbrk) returns 0x642000. I've tried to track down why this is happening, but it just gets weirder the more I look. temacs.exe runs with no problem because something called bss_sbrk is used to increase the heap. However, before temacs exits it strips out all of the bss_sbrk stuff, falling back to the standard sbrk. It's the standard sbrk that is returning a pointer < _heapbase. Additionally, (in bootstrap-emacs.exe) _malloc_initialize (in gmalloc.c) doesn't appear to be called, ever, which makes me wonder how _heapinfo and _heapbase are ever being initialized. I ran boostrap-emacs.exe under gdb and had it break in malloc_initialize (somewhere in cygwin1.dll) to see if I could trace when emacs' _malloc_initialize was called. Surprisingly, _malloc_initialized (also in gmalloc.c) already had a value of 1. I have had no luck finding the change to cygwin that caused this. Reputedly, this has been a problem since the 1.5.19 version of cygwin1.dll. Any thoughts? Sean