From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: [PATCH] About the :distant-foreground face attribute Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:56:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <44ae2758-9596-4dff-9c07-45878acd8136@default> References: <<87bnzo9cja.fsf@gnu.org>> <<59B7E7FC-48D0-4737-B1BB-FFAC5BA9E07A@swipnet.se>> <<874n5f3162.fsf@gnu.org>> <<83fvozf86g.fsf@gnu.org>> <<87r48javwe.fsf@gnu.org>> <<83bnzmfjxe.fsf@gnu.org>> <<52D3E689.6050902@dancol.org>> <<8E16225F-53EF-498A-AB35-66EB9B33B859@swipnet.se>> <<52D43360.6050605@dancol.org>> <<9BD01B88-AF13-44DD-8DBE-4598BAC136DD@swipnet.se>> <<52D45C73.6090906@dancol.org>> <<52D4EBA9.8050802@swipnet.se>> <<52D4F2C2.8080800@dancol.org>> <<52D504A7.80104@swipnet.se>> <<52D514FF.7010404@dancol.org>> <<52D52312.6070106@swipnet.se>> <<52D58632.3010106@dancol.org>> <<381DEBDC-71D8-4FAC-BA55-897FEC73A2FC@swipnet.se>> <<52D5A072.5010508@dancol.org>> <<064CFFB5-6E50-40D5-B2CB-2BECC656D93F@swipnet.se>> <<174db5f5-db14-4484-a2f9-9478d2f5fea1@default>> <<83y52h52cd.fsf@gnu.org>> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389758223 16954 80.91.229.3 (15 Jan 2014 03:57:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, dancol@dancol.org, cyd@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 15 04:57:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W3HbE-0006PF-NJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 04:57:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51949 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3HbD-00021V-VM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:57:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37092) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Hb3-00020M-9i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:57:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Hau-0002UB-OI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:56:53 -0500 Original-Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:51521) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3Hal-0002Te-JX; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:56:35 -0500 Original-Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s0F3uRNw001018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:56:28 GMT Original-Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0F3uRd6021253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:56:27 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0009.oracle.com (abhmp0009.oracle.com [141.146.116.15]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0F3uQms020868; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:56:26 GMT In-Reply-To: <<83y52h52cd.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.81 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168418 Archived-At: > > > But I always assumed we are talking post-release here as your > > > code clearly don't belong in a feature freeze. > > > > Nor does your code that introduced this regression. >=20 > Jan committed his changes before the freeze, so your argument is > invalid. OK, so it belongs in the pretest. But it is a bug, and should be fixed before the release. One opinion.