From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are and not called and ? Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 09:53:06 +0200 Message-ID: <44F93862.9070004@student.lu.se> References: <85y7t2zr2a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157183624 23190 80.91.229.2 (2 Sep 2006 07:53:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 07:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 02 09:53:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GJQJq-0001LC-1Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 09:53:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GJQJn-00081Z-5N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 03:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GJQJY-0007z3-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 03:53:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GJQJV-0007vL-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 03:53:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GJQJV-0007v5-CM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 03:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.228.11.159] (helo=pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GJQTT-0003ZA-RJ; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 04:03:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.123.121] (83.249.218.244) by pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.075) id 44F6EBEE00073DE6; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 09:53:09 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85y7t2zr2a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59247 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > "Drew Adams" writes: > > >> May I then suggest a little smaller change for this instead? Could we >> have a human readable table with translations from internal key names >> like , to standard keyboard names? Just those names that >> differ should go into the table of course. >> >> That's a good suggestion. It should be phrased in terms of "often >> used as labels on many keyboards" etc., to avoid giving the >> impression that this is standard; it is common among many keyboards, >> but it is by no means standard (there is no standard for such labels >> AFAIK). >> > > Maybe the "Emacs terminology" info page is a reasonable place for > that? It is not really Emacs terminology, but people might look for > it there. > That is fine for me. (And I think it is about Emacs terminology.)