From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changing of line format and undo Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:11:00 +0200 Message-ID: <44EBD554.6050909@student.lu.se> References: <44987375.2010000@student.lu.se> <449961F6.6020001@student.lu.se> <85mzc6y204.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <44996AE1.7020907@student.lu.se> <858xnqxyg9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <4499781F.7090802@student.lu.se> <87k66wvx4u.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1156306287 16560 80.91.229.2 (23 Aug 2006 04:11:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 23 06:11:24 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GFk5L-0002Wo-5y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:11:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GFk5K-0006nJ-FZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:11:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GFk54-0006j9-1P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:11:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GFk53-0006hb-7L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GFk53-0006hP-2a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.228.11.159] (helo=pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GFkCm-00064Y-KG; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:19:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.123.121] (83.249.218.244) by pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.075) id 44A135F100BDBAA0; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:11:02 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58760 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > I am not convinced it is correct to try to make undo cover changes > in how the buffer would be saved. > See it from the users point of view. Is it not desireable then to be able to undo all changes that will be saved to disk? Or are there any logical problems regarding this (since undo is buffer specific) that can cause problems later? I can not find any. Saving is buffer specific.