From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs gtk2 toolbar bug? Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:27:40 +0200 Message-ID: <44E9525C.7030302@swipnet.se> References: <87r6zau3j7.fsf@furball.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1156141724 20953 80.91.229.2 (21 Aug 2006 06:28:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 06:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Leon , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 21 08:28:42 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GF3H3-0005ae-GO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:28:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GF3H2-00088u-Tc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:28:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GF3Gk-00085T-PJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GF3Gj-00083N-Pw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GF3Gj-00082y-Ka for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.228.9.180] (helo=av6-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GF3O3-0003aH-O4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:35:51 -0400 Original-Received: by av6-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 90B4438269; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:28:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.101]) by av6-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522D238267; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:28:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from coolsville.localdomain (81-235-205-204-no59.tbcn.telia.com [81.235.205.204]) by smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAF037E4B; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:28:15 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808) Original-To: Chong Yidong In-Reply-To: <87r6zau3j7.fsf@furball.mit.edu> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58590 Archived-At: Chong Yidong skrev: > Leon writes: > >> In gtk2 emacs, when tool-bar-mode goes from on to off or vice versa, >> the bottom edge of the frame will move up/down the height of the >> toolbar. This will make the minibuffer have different heights when >> the frame is maximized. > > I don't understand what you mean. When the Emacs frame is not > minimized, toggling the tool-bar moves the bottom edge of the frame, > it's true; but when the frame is maximized, toggling does not move the > bottom edge. If it does, that is a bug. It might depend on the window manager though, what WM are you running, Leon? > > I do not see a drastically different minibuffer height with the > tool-bar either on or off, at least on the version of Gnome shipped > with Ubuntu Dapper. I don't see it with a recent uptodate CVS HEAD either. Not so good visually, but the window resizes itself so that the minibuffer is the same height. Jan D.