From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to stop find-grep-dired? Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:18:09 +0200 Message-ID: <44E72BB1.9070206@student.lu.se> References: <44E5DACB.10608@student.lu.se> <44E6C066.7010008@student.lu.se> <85hd09mao0.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <44E6C73C.7030302@student.lu.se> <8564gpm8nb.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <44E6CDA5.3080102@student.lu.se> <851wrdm7pe.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <44E6EA9F.7080700@student.lu.se> <85oduhknn3.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <44E725F1.3010203@student.lu.se> <85ac60lqas.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1156000731 22184 80.91.229.2 (19 Aug 2006 15:18:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 19 17:18:49 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GESak-0006mv-Ik for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:18:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GESaj-0006f3-SO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:18:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GESaV-0006cV-M7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:18:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GESaT-0006a2-KK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:18:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GESaT-0006Zd-B0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:18:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.228.8.164] (helo=pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GEShP-0004SU-5j; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 11:25:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.123.121] (83.249.218.244) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.075) id 44A2F19F00AAB59A; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:18:10 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85ac60lqas.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58516 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > I disagree. C-g is supposed to stop Emacs, not other processes. I > don't consider it a good idea to have to worry about arbitrary > processes terminating. Would it be better if some processes were excluded? Could something else be done to enhance my idea? (Except dropping it ;-) > IIRC, keyboard-quit events even cut straight > across a lot of the input loop. It is probably not even useful to > rebind them in local keymaps, since those keymaps might not be active > at the time C-g is pressed. > Thanks.