From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Roehler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: text-texi - Node: Text Properties - After first paragraph Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:06:03 +0200 Message-ID: <44AA2F7B.4030004@easy-emacs.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1152003954 17296 80.91.229.2 (4 Jul 2006 09:05:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Thien-Thi Nguyen , Richard Stallman , Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 04 11:05:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxgqQ-0008G2-RJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:05:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxgqQ-0004Le-Dw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:05:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FxgqF-0004LZ-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FxgqA-0004L7-OY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxgqA-0004L4-JN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:05:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.227.126.177] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fxh3j-0008Q7-I1; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:19:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [84.190.193.93] (helo=[192.168.178.23]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKxQS-1Fxgq12giF-0008Pj; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:04:58 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) Original-To: emacs-devel X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:62d13292e0fce6aaed56aaadcb96352d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56472 Archived-At: As users probably first encounter the terminus `face' in this context, it might be helpful to give just one sentence here concerning the relation between `properties' and `faces'. So I conceive properties as the most fundamental category, whereas faces are of higher order, a more combined and complex one. Right or wrong? __ Andreas Roehler