From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Visual cleanup for customize buffers Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:50:54 +0100 Message-ID: <43C9642E.3050301@student.lu.se> References: <200601122345.k0CNjx114407@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200601131418.k0DEIld23354@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137272192 6729 80.91.229.2 (14 Jan 2006 20:56:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 21:56:29 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ExsRi-0002Sw-30 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:56:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ExsTt-0007kG-PY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:58:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ExsOk-0003r4-Bc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:53:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ExsOj-0003qc-Pn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:53:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ExsOj-0003qX-AP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:53:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.228.8.83] (helo=pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ExsRt-0002Ss-NW; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:56:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.123.121] (83.249.218.244) by pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.069.1) id 43C77BA400069A02; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:50:55 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49099 Archived-At: Richard M. Stallman wrote: > b) if the visibility affects the operation of "save settings", it > makes absolutely no sense that some options start out being shown, > others hidden. > > It is absolutely essential that large values start out hidden. > Would it perhaps be easy to make it impossible to hide a value that has been changed and not set in the current custom buffer? That could perhaps be a bit less confusing.