From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug, probably related to Custom Themes. Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 23:11:15 +0100 Message-ID: <43B9A503.5090803@student.lu.se> References: <200512210254.jBL2sj814876@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87d5jqrvuo.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200512212219.jBLMJ3R29494@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87lkydx021.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200512220351.jBM3pvX02615@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <8764phpyvf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200512230029.jBN0TgT16314@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <1135392570.183714.29626.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <200512250324.jBP3OdM16529@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200601022026.k02KQQh21528@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1136239906 15314 80.91.229.2 (2 Jan 2006 22:11:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, ams@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 02 23:11:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EtXu0-0004h7-3d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 23:11:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EtXva-0006y8-QF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 17:13:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EtXvR-0006xp-G5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 17:13:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EtXvQ-0006xd-10 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 17:13:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EtXvP-0006xa-UE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 17:13:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.228.8.83] (helo=pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EtXwU-0004xl-E0; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 17:14:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.123.121] (83.249.218.244) by pne-smtpout1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.069.1) id 43B3E3B2000E92C6; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 23:11:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-Reply-To: <200601022026.k02KQQh21528@raven.dms.auburn.edu> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48633 Archived-At: Luc Teirlinck wrote: >Richard Stallman wrote: > > Maybe we could change "Reset to Current" to "Discard Edits", as > somebody suggested at one point ("Reset to current" is not going to > reset any setting, only text in the Custom buffer.) > > How about "Show Current Settings" or "Show Current Values"? > >It is longer than the current text and, to me, not clearer at all. >Actually, it would be confusing, certainly for the whole buffer >button. It makes it appear that you have to press this button to see >the current values and makes you wonder what the shown values are >(defaults, saved values?). For the State button message, the plural >is wrong. > > Perhaps it would be more clear if the button corresponding to the values that is shown were disabled and dimmed? Or maybe replaced with a text like "Showing Current Values"? But as Luc point out this would require changing the logic too. >"Reset to Saved" does exactly what it says: it resets to the saved >value. It does not just show the saved value. >... >Actually, "Erase Customization" is not that bad. I just thought >changing "Reset to Current" to "Discard Edits" would make it still >more clear that the edits in the buffer are just edits, not >customizations, thereby eliminating any confusion for >"Erase Customization" as well. > > I like Erase Customization too.