From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adrian Robert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NS: ns-expand-space / slider in Preferences dialog not functional Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: <43AB5E3F-3BD4-45BB-B390-84C2722FF38F@gmail.com> References: <21F51971-5679-45BF-85A0-D982CA73E722@gmail.com> <5393D476-3312-4DF3-AF39-6D698B7FDA49@gmail.com> <06CD0A2A-6B89-4E1A-BBA6-E91F03A289DD@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1236637653 25735 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2009 22:27:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Reitter , Emacs-Devel devel , YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu , Miles Bader To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 09 23:28:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lgnxp-0000w5-1J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:28:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59852 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LgnwT-0003Vj-39 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LgmPg-0006no-1a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:49:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LgmPd-0006jh-AT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:49:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37389 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LgmPd-0006jU-2B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:49:25 -0400 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]:45701) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LgmPa-0006DA-KV; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:49:22 -0400 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b11so308315nfh.26 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:49:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding :from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=udICjJFCNAavWup4PHUx2kSwaw6SEwMAA/ePpjy39Wc=; b=M8fr0dKmBKnCLqR0Kzgp4FCGVXoMGKb006JXQBPegtfUuQ+nMW/BMbpxp2ugZwHPl9 I5oKpbC5gtC/Ns2SqzSmsF2cEr5Pi+f1IQr/desWP8ZjPlH9erdFhmxMEXScx+LupqCJ 3l2Y7xZW/nt3kE1HYBbA7rXYMrjTQ0hiudmPU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=gth5l7f6zhy3p/9bLIuNgVTHXzOE/TwwGbMYvIZ2UILhcBQPwC8pSmUXbA1psIj8nP pDyl5E8tNTaJS2zPzXPNoilEAM7ttK1qWKMV2WuPtlpx4rG9zAuh4JLeuob1nrxx2g7Y f5jLsdJs2Pu5ofbkuyS3NlsEFSAQXJ/fc2RVY= Original-Received: by 10.216.30.81 with SMTP id j59mr2338512wea.50.1236631760157; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?93.106.189.122? (gprs-prointernet-ffbd6a00-122.dhcp.inet.fi [93.106.189.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c4sm8291860nfi.60.2009.03.09.13.49.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:49:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109529 Archived-At: On Mar 9, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> But now that the situation is what it is I stand by what I say >> above: it >> doesn't interfere with anything in core emacs (as it is / should be >> additive with line-spacing), users benefit from it, and others can >> use it >> to try and see whether it's something that would be worth having >> on X and >> W32. There's no benefit to removing it. > > This would encourage the use of MacOSX to try the feature. As long as > MacOSX is not Free Software, this goes against our goals. Also I > think > it's pretty clear that the `line-spacing' feature can be expanded to > cover the featureset of `ns-expand-space' and that it would be good > since it would remove a redundant setting, and bring that feature to > all architectures. > > So we should remove ns-expand-space right now. If we can come up with > a clean enough patch to extend line-spacing's semantics, we might be > able to consider it for inclusion in Emacs-23.1, otherwise it'll > have to > wait for Emacs-23.2. OK.