From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: mouse-drag-mode-line should maybe use window-tree Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:04:34 +0100 Message-ID: <43947322.7090901@student.lu.se> References: <200511251837.jAPIbONx025976@brains.moreideas.ca> <438F8DA5.1040102@ourcomments.org> <87zmngbdts.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133803732 32731 80.91.229.2 (5 Dec 2005 17:28:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 17:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman@ourcomments.org, Stefan Monnier , emacs@whaite.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 05 18:28:51 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjK6r-0000YF-Mc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:26:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjK70-0006Mr-0s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:26:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EjJlj-0000pN-BT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:04:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EjJli-0000oy-Gf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:04:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjJli-0000os-C3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:04:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.228.8.164] (helo=pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EjJmA-0007rD-Dq; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:05:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.123.121] (83.249.218.244) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.060.1) id 438DFE2300163689; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:04:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47012 Archived-At: Richard M. Stallman wrote: >For this meaning, I think it is better to use a different function. >However, maybe we should eliminate the PRESERVE-BEFORE argument now. >It was an attempt at doing what we have now done better; perhaps >we should get rid of it rather than release it. > > No objections to that, I think I have switched to the new function everywhere.