From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist` Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 10:00:20 +0100 Message-ID: <436ef066-76ca-7742-c021-a1ce2407a61b@gmx.at> References: <159cd3c2-a0c4-63e2-ebb2-ce0f5f8c343e@gmx.at> <69e6899b-9e93-9a97-a8bc-4ce9a9f0ae4c@gmx.at> <69387717-1eaa-6019-0000-4c95c61e1bc3@gmx.at> <1f026837-af56-435f-9d4e-048a18af07eb@gmx.at> <488b181f-c74e-d97b-b168-a602158c3e7b@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24483"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 67249@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 25 10:01:25 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r6oXU-00069P-82 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 10:01:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r6oX6-0007Z3-UO; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 04:01:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r6oX4-0007Ym-LN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 04:00:59 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r6oX2-000397-TB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 04:00:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r6oX7-0000MH-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 04:01:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 09:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67249 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 67249-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67249.17009028411326 (code B ref 67249); Sat, 25 Nov 2023 09:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2023 09:00:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37782 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r6oWm-0000LJ-Sg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 04:00:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:42383) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r6oWj-0000L4-4v for 67249@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 04:00:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.at; s=s31663417; t=1700902822; x=1701507622; i=rudalics@gmx.at; bh=l6wmpa1Kw64XNIjHSfkXhMlxlSLNRdxxHuyMS6HASEM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To; b=JjU3lnbHBKBQrGlvPD4Mq8+4WcWEuvdW1eyavd9w7M7aX+KH2GbVwbjhU6nylKCg WKAEme3WsZTD0UpNZoukRkXRdA/BPQO+p3QKGkjEouq4TX20Zjmhi4s7H9NrxmvMM xVyzNJobCyvyAzSz3GbgrqWZylndav1+3IVyQI2xsckVb7nb7SNGDrG7Y89er29eJ 7S1vcwhzwY0wOfeuhrkdM6NvsfVmvtMhNQusAnpKcOL53XeklYrCO0FDw6goO/ga/ qkHThPO/JHCqagfekaLHwOgm2we3CkXWlCgLOz5flsY2PwUvkcEd2g4KIekhrnMCh vh8YgxMDS1ZMxozl8g== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from [192.168.31.113] ([212.95.5.137]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MOiDd-1qxF6132A3-00Q9aL; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 10:00:22 +0100 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:UkCe5g7SbDA6QcVnA4qkT/pJvOL5LMzTZ6QySxVAyRKS/DgBLzJ EepNa2etzxEDIOBvh31ZoI7XBQ/uGT2PH8SQ3AY76ELsfJm0Rf+QaesSncXHFglX2AZ3LYl fgeB+hWvavCqflZmYIKW1RqjxqRFa/RRQW5XTcJuYjgprSpGQwnoV87EmaPJPvV0Xk7KuSv ZxBHdbieDYp3ib0q+3iWw== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:Jif4G+szaFY=;gJlOdgRfPeh2EmlHqnrJ/03N1j2 0hGyEyzkhicXOnEpRFeb0g+XUlRUrRDoYuKRcCyJsojtEYTlev+7GOutyDXbte22F/VImXJTd UA178OTYQT+LRwRc3R34q5i3d1G/dNWwS8nwgW/t0a8BheLYRnMaxQI+mqqHOUlrRsoDtWO1A cQXThVg1dm/fQwGecHbe919oUhuv04a5FUdazKhUWTNvsM0NRqolMqzBVvcO6ZEsBuf38TGhe ff2/sAXTqMwgz7Fc3m0zQ6NZJzbMItDietI9BX7w44VE+b9pLzBlYy3jTX1lj8uPzXHLnWWIs umHVCuc4iC8sDr69kMT0CPYPTethXCQSvTzy97+Iir4R/TAxxP9py6vYnMQsGuZyLymAVEVuU xYSUEn1C/XrpUlTsx3Ehb042wvWoSXlo+RpHTqoQY20dW1E+Sbw69k20IYiwbm6UXn9wlPEMT u+xi29+rV9/yc4Nwam7Jg472nhLAm00L+cN3Umi7+l6AU2Kq9UUpx9WjvQWAOh3t6Mw3koXQX qVjtidgXrMA81sIchxohWIE3P4mn/g7KYtBHgoXyYZKyTu3v1LVrRkKlU6uQHi0phGHhJRdqV +UAlHWr8+Tr3ikY1/WSRzsjiUoly/Of0zHJ5+2uDEfurWqdiYHeW2ee1nELEPrlwXbJkEknBS Cx97DdIWmJD0p+KXR/TgBymmbx0uhpuNqOHOPAt9lcy1YX+D/dxJJI1/GmPuI8uOu+HpjnOvZ 5zReCBHJAWFt7LAr1J0vSYQ/kukSaM5EbnKO+sli2POUtTslqp4kueAMHpQDaqsHFWe2/j6x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:274929 Archived-At: >> Do you mean 'display-buffer-override-next-command' and >> 'display-buffer-record-window'? > > I mostly noticed `display-buffer-other-frame` whose name (to me) > suggests it can be used in an ACTION. The two you cite could be > considered as colliding, but since their name doesn't suggest they're > going to "display a buffer", they didn't bother me. > > Hmm... after looking a bit more maybe it's not that bad, since the > calling convention can be used to distinguish them > (e.g. `display-buffer-other-frame` doesn't take an ALIST after the > BUFFER). 'display-buffer-other-frame' was in files.el so C-x 5 C-o could be bound to it - mainly as counterpart to C-x 4 C-o, I suppose. It would be more consistent to have two functions say 'show-buffer-other-window' and 'show-buffer-other-frame' we could bind to C-x 4 C-b and C-x 5 C-b and assign them appropriate action functions but I'm not sure whether people would like it. martin