From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: C-h C-t should show the TODO
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 20:58:45 +0300
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <4331-Wed01May2002205844+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <ap3r8kwpd9j.fsf@fosters.umd.edu>
	<5567-Wed01May2002193158+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <ap3pu0fx0u5.fsf@fosters.umd.edu>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020276068 18581 127.0.0.1 (1 May 2002 18:01:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 18:01:08 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 172yPc-0004pa-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 01 May 2002 20:01:08 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 172yUS-0001gs-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 01 May 2002 20:06:08 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 172yOi-00025W-00; Wed, 01 May 2002 14:00:12 -0400
Original-Received: from heimdall.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.17])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 172yO0-00022F-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 01 May 2002 13:59:28 -0400
Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40])
	by heimdall.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.54-GA)
	with ESMTP id BJJ53490;
	Wed, 1 May 2002 20:59:19 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: deego@glue.umd.edu
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-Reply-To: <ap3pu0fx0u5.fsf@fosters.umd.edu> (deego@glue.umd.edu)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3488
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3488

> From: "D. Goel" <deego@glue.umd.edu>
> Date: 01 May 2002 12:57:38 -0400
> 
> so what do you think of the C-h C-t --> TODO suggestion? 

I don't have an opinion, so I'll defer to others.  (In general, TODO
is something for the developers, so I'm not sure C-h C-t is
necessary.)

> i shall try to reexamine the TODO and see if it can be organized
> better in debian-packaging style.   Until then, do the above
> suggestions look reasonable?   

I don't consider myself an expert in Web page design, but if you could
send patches to the HTML you find on www.gnu.org, I will gladly apply
those patches, provided that no one objects.

Thanks.