From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8179: 24.0.50; vc thinks that SVN takes care of all my files Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:35:06 -0400 Message-ID: <42d3lsjhxx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300217856 31597 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2011 19:37:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8179@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 15 20:37:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pza3b-0004z2-7P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:37:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45733 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pza3a-0006A1-Hb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:37:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34723 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pza3C-00061T-8f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pza3A-00023o-NF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:37:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pza3A-00023k-KP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:37:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pza2D-0001IM-PF; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8179.13002177154923 (code B ref 8179); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Mar 2011 19:35:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pza1S-0001HM-Oz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:35:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pza1R-0001HA-0t for 8179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:35:13 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55560) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pza1L-0005rT-8G; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:35:07 -0400 X-Spook: ANC fundamentalist LABLINK fissionable Operation Iraqi X-Ran: m}{}2zMa#LBp?(X}}0c9s-Gs!NdPc|(by!"SN9M?Np.7x.2&dhA\{e#wrc+q0$pM1 (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:04:04 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:36:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45053 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> If it's not possible, it should be moved to the end of the list. > > I think the better approach is to use a "breadth first search". I don't really understand that turn of phrase. Do you mean: look for all possible backends in the PWD, if none found, then go up a level, repeat?