From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: LanX Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: cperl-mode - how people outline their code? Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 03:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <42cceb0f-bf46-4021-91a8-ef0e01895be3@k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> References: <547e499c-4ece-4f8a-b4d7-30fca1a17e9c@8g2000yqz.googlegroups.com> <1f20519e-8129-4b8b-933e-f890d7581f70@n5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <8e392a81-3544-4e6a-a92d-5cc3acb060b5@s7g2000vbk.googlegroups.com> <347cd78d-941a-4a4c-a50b-19df69abdf3b@y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273015134 5939 80.91.229.12 (4 May 2010 23:18:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 23:18:54 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 05 01:18:53 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9RO5-00082j-Pj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 01:18:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55822 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O9RO5-0001Lq-2t for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 19:18:49 -0400 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 25 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 188.107.210.20 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1272190510 13512 127.0.0.1 (25 Apr 2010 10:15:10 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=188.107.210.20; posting-account=W9fpQwoAAADZYmkl-8sXk1VPxG3rq-Pd User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.0.18) Gecko/2010021502 Ubuntu/8.10 (intrepid) Firefox/3.0.18,gzip(gfe) Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:177860 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:73279 Archived-At: Hi > Now how would these two different outline semantics be reflected on > the "interleaved" file? =A0Would one want to have two different "active" > levels, one for POD, another for code? I think the problem is how to map these two channels onto linear outline levels... I just sometimes want to fold all embedded pod - like function headers - away... so maybe just a switch is enough? hs-minor-mode has a flag to "hide all comments when hiding all" > Puzzled, > Ilya me too, outline-minor-mode is not very intuitive to handle ... mabe hideshow is better. IMHO a brainstorm at perlmonks is the best strategy... Cheers Rolf