From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=FCdiger?= Sonderfeld Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is intellisense features integration in Emacs technically possible? Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:49:07 +0100 Message-ID: <42135829.UacbDn8H0U@descartes> References: <1390269670.2888.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <83vbxcfzaa.fsf@gnu.org> <87eh40fx9j.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390380580 9801 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2014 08:49:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 22 09:49:47 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W5tVF-0001ik-QP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:49:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34270 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5tVF-0006QF-Ft for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:49:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5tV5-0006MV-GQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:49:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5tUx-0001Rk-I5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:49:31 -0500 Original-Received: from ptmx.org ([178.63.28.110]:55833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5tUx-0001RI-C4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:49:23 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptmx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DF525072; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:49:22 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ptmx.org Original-Received: from ptmx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ptmx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RXUhm3uJuERc; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:49:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from descartes.localnet (chello080108246092.7.14.vie.surfer.at [80.108.246.92]) by ptmx.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C153022A74; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:49:20 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/4.11.3 (Linux/3.11.0-14-generic; KDE/4.11.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <87eh40fx9j.fsf@wanadoo.es> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 178.63.28.110 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168877 Archived-At: On Wednesday 22 January 2014 05:36:40 =C3=93scar Fuentes wrote: > > I'm quite sure rewriting all that is more than would be needed for > > intellisense support. >=20 > Writing a C++ parser and semantic analyzer from scratch requires seve= ral > man-years of work for world-class compiler writers. And with every ne= w > C++ standard that comes out the effort increases significantly. Why would we have to write a C++ parser and semantic analyzer? There i= s one=20 in CEDET, there is one in GCC, there is one in libclang, and there is o= ne in=20 the KDevelop libraries. Regards, R=C3=BCdiger