From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [mega@hotpop.com: Re: x-backspace-delete-keys-p] Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:50:57 +0100 Message-ID: <42076431.1020805@swipnet.se> References: <42028965.2060902@swipnet.se> <7883d812b65fe2b1bbddbc18cf272ece@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107781323 30756 80.91.229.2 (7 Feb 2005 13:02:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 07 14:02:03 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cy8Wc-0001j6-9g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:01:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cy8kb-0006vI-Nd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 08:16:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cy8Za-0000mv-JV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 08:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cy8ZX-0000kg-MC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 08:05:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cy8ZX-0000jV-1U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 08:04:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.54.107.73] (helo=mxfep02.bredband.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cy8MK-0000Mv-Qq; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 07:51:21 -0500 Original-Received: from coolsville.localdomain ([83.226.180.210] [83.226.180.210]) by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20050207125119.QUAC24781.mxfep02.bredband.com@coolsville.localdomain>; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:51:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33001 Richard Stallman wrote: > For a non-expert user I think the current code is more correct. If you > have both keys and one doesn't do what you expect, you probably will > try the other. But if Backspace or Delete is mapped to a non-obvious > key combination that you don't know about, the best thing is to not > turn on normal-erase-is-backspace. > >Ok. Could you add a comment to that place in the code >explaining this reasoning for deciding not to change it? > Done. Jan D.