On 15 December 2017 at 15:54, John Wiegley <johnw@gnu.org> wrote:>>>>> "j" == jun <netjune@163.com> writes:
j> like this: (copy-sequence seq &optional from to). 'from' and 'to' mean the
j> same as in the function 'substring'.
I'd rather not overload copy-sequence that way, and rather have a new function
named (sublist LIST &optional FROM TO), even if copy-sequence xs == sublist xs.There is already the function ‘subseq’ that does exactly this, or did I misunderstandthe question?